Ch. 7 Time Value of Money and Valuations
7.7 Income Statement-Based Valuations
Learning Objectives
After this section, you will be able to:
- Analyze and adjust reported earnings to estimate normalized earnings for business valuation.
- Apply income capitalization and P/E-based valuation methods, and evaluate their assumptions and limitations.
INCOME STATEMENT-BASED VALUATIONS
Valuing a business can also be approached through its income statement by estimating how much earnings it will generate in the future. This method known as earnings capitalization translates anticipated earnings into present value by applying a required rate of return, or capitalization rate. To apply this technique, two key inputs are required: an estimate of future earnings and an appropriate capitalization rate.
1. Estimating Earnings
Capitalizing earnings starts with projecting how much income the business will generate. This typically involves analyzing accounting earnings better known as the “bottom line” on the income statement. With this approach, two key challenges arise including timing issues and reporting issues.
Timing Issues: Valuation looks to the future, but our best evidence often comes from past performance.
Example: Microsoft’s Net Income
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) reported the following net income over three years:
| Year | Net Income | |
| 2024 | $88.14 billion | |
| 2023 | $72.36 billion | |
| 2022 | $72.74 billion |
Which number should be used? If this year’s income is unusually high or low due to one-time events, it may distort the projection. To address this, analysts often calculate normalized earnings or an average of earnings over three to five years, adjusted for anomalies.
Normalized Earnings = ($72.74 + 72.36 + 88.14) / 3 years = $233.24/ 3 years = $77.75 billion
With 7.47 billion shares outstanding, the normalized earnings per share is approximately $10.41 per share (i.e., $77.75 billion/ 7.47 billion shares).
Equal weighting can be refined if certain years are more representative than others. For instance, the most recent year might be given extra weight if it’s more indicative of current operations.
Reporting Issue: Even “net income” can be subjective, as it’s shaped by accounting choices. Methods of inventory valuation (FIFO vs. LIFO), depreciation (straight-line vs. accelerated), and bad debt provisioning all influence reported earnings. Though GAAP requires consistency within a company over time, changes in accounting methods do occur, and differences between companies may distort comparisons.
For example, MSFT changed its useful lives for servers and network equipment from four to six years in 2023, reducing the depreciation expense recognized in 2023 and 2024. Adjustments may be needed to ensure comparability across time.
2. Choosing a Capitalization Rate
Once normalized earnings are estimated, we apply a capitalization (cap) rate, the rate of return an investor requires to justify the investment, reflecting the risk that the earnings may not materialize as expected.
The basic formula is:
Value = Earnings/Capitalization Rate
Example: Capitalization Rate
If MSFT’s normalized earnings are $77.75 billion, and investors require an 8% return due to perceived risks, its value would be:
Value = Earnings/Capitalization Rate = $77.75 billion/0.08 = $971.875 billion
Where:
- Normalized Earnings (E) = $77.75 billion
- Required Return (Cap Rate, R) = 8% = 0.08
- Implied Value of Microsoft = $971.88 billion
This means if investors require an 8% return, and Microsoft’s normalized earnings are $77.75 billion, the implied valuation of Microsoft would be approximately $971.88 billion.
In general, the higher the risk, the higher the required rate of return, which leads to a lower valuation. Conversely, companies with stable, predictable earnings can justify lower cap rates and higher valuations. While industry guidelines and market benchmarks can provide helpful starting points, the selected capitalization rate should reflect the specific risk profile of the business and prevailing economic conditions.
3. The Price-Earnings (P/E) Ratio
The P/E ratio measures how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of a company’s earnings. It is calculated by dividing a company’s stock price by its earnings per share (EPS), and it reflects investor perceptions of risk, growth potential, and overall market sentiment.
Example: Price-Earnings Ratio
MSFT’s stock traded between $363.62 and $464.00 in 2024. With earnings per share of $11.80 in 2024, its P/E ratio ranged from approximately 31x to 39x. This means investors were paying 31 to 39 times MSFT’s earnings for each share.
From the P/E ratio, we can derive the implied capitalization rate, which is simply the reciprocal of the P/E ratio:
Implied Capitalization Rate =1 divided by P/E Ratio
The implied capitalization rate reflects the return investors expect, given the perceived risk and earnings potential. In MSFT’s case, the relatively low implied capitalization rate (ie., approximately 3%) illustrates that the market has a positive view of the company’s future prospects.
However, market sentiment isn’t always rational. If we believe MSFT’s earnings potential is undervalued, we might see the stock as a good investment opportunity. Conversely, if we think the market is overestimating its prospects, we might avoid or sell the stock.
Importantly, stock prices often fluctuate for reasons unrelated to business fundamentals. Emotional reactions—such as fear during downturns or euphoria during booms—can distort market valuations. For example, it is common for the price of a typical publicly traded stock to swing as much as 30 to 50% within a single year, even though the company’s actual financial condition remains stable.
This volatility highlights the importance of fundamental valuation techniques, such as analyzing earnings, cash flows, and capitalization rates. These tools help investors (and lawyers evaluating financial claims or investments) distinguish between true value and market hype.
Limitations of Income Statement-Based Valuations
Just as balance sheet–based valuation methods are often incomplete because they overlook a business’s earning potential, income statement–based approaches such as earnings capitalization or applying price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios, also have notable limitations.
When capitalizing earnings, the method depends heavily on accounting-based earnings which are influenced by rules and conventions that may not reflect true economic performance. Additionally, this approach focuses on estimated earnings without considering how those earnings will actually be used, whether distributed to shareholders as dividends or reinvested in the business.
Valuation, ultimately, is about estimating the future stream of payments that investors expect to receive. For P/E ratios to serve as a reliable valuation tool, two key assumptions must hold:
- The P/E ratio must be based on expected future average earnings, not just historical results.
- It must assume that all earnings will be distributed to shareholders as dividends, rather than retained by the company.
Because these assumptions are often unrealistic, income statement–based valuation methods can provide an incomplete picture of value. This leads to the use of a more comprehensive approach, cash flow–based valuation, which focuses directly on the future cash available to investors, regardless of accounting conventions.
Summary
Income statement–based valuation methods, such as earnings capitalization and the use of price-to-earnings ratios, offer valuable tools for estimating a business’s worth based on its expected profitability. These approaches emphasize forward-looking analysis while grounding valuation in historical financial data, adjusted through techniques like normalized earnings and investor-required capitalization rates. However, their effectiveness depends on the accuracy of earnings estimates, the relevance of accounting policies, and the rationality of market sentiment. While useful, these methods have limitations particularly in assuming earnings accurately reflect economic reality and will be fully distributed to shareholders. As such, income-based valuation should be applied thoughtfully, often in combination with other approaches, to arrive at a more complete and reliable assessment of business value.
Homework Problem 7.7
Part 1:
ByteLogic’s reported net income for the past three years (in billions) is:
| Year | Net Income ($ billions) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $22.8 |
| 2023 | $17.5 |
| 2022 | $20.0 |
The 2023 results were depressed by a one-time $2.5 billion litigation settlement. The company has 3.2 billion shares outstanding.
Requirements
-
Compute normalized earnings using a three-year average after adjusting 2023 income upward for the one-time settlement.
-
Compute earnings per share (EPS) based on normalized earnings.
Part 2:
You learn that investors in comparable software companies expect annual returns between 9% and 11%, depending on risk.
Requirements
-
Using your normalized earnings, compute ByteLogic’s implied total company value at both a 9% and an 11% capitalization rate.
-
Discuss how the valuation changes with different risk assumptions.
Part 3:
Requirements
A comparable public company, SoftCom PLC, trades at a P/E ratio of 30.
-
Using ByteLogic’s EPS, compute the implied stock price if investors applied the same P/E multiple.
-
Compute the implied capitalization rate using the reciprocal of the P/E ratio.
-
Compare your capitalization-rate valuation to the P/E-based valuation and discuss which seems more realistic.