"

14. Applied Sociological Communication

Overview

In this final chapter, we bring everything together by focusing on how to apply what you’ve learned about sociological communication in meaningful ways. Whether you’re advocating for social justice, giving a public presentation, or navigating communication in your community or career, your words and choices have power.

We’ll begin by exploring how communication can be a tool for social change, shaping public awareness, challenging injustice, and mobilizing collective action. (MLO1)

Next, we’ll look at public speaking and persuasion as social acts. You’ll learn how audience, identity, and context affect how messages are crafted and received, and how to develop communication that is both compelling and culturally responsive. (MLO2)

Finally, we’ll examine inclusive and ethical communication practices. Whether you’re leading a meeting, organizing a campaign, or writing for the public, we’ll discuss strategies for connecting across differences, managing conflict, and building trust. (MLO3)

By the end of this chapter, you’ll be able to use sociological tools and communication strategies to engage diverse audiences, promote equity, and make your message matter.

Module Learning Outcomes

By the end of this chapter, students will have had the opportunity to:

  • Explain how communication can support social change in institutional, community, or digital settings. (MLO1)
  • Analyze how social identities, cultural expectations, and audience dynamics shape public speaking and persuasion. (MLO2)
  • Apply inclusive and ethical communication strategies to real-world issues or personal goals. (MLO3)

These Module Learning Outcomes align with CLOs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7, and ULOs 1-6. See the Introduction for more details.

Communication for Social Change

Communication as a Tool for Social Transformation

Communication is more than just exchanging information; it’s a powerful tool for influencing beliefs, challenging systems, and driving change. In every social movement, from civil rights to climate justice, communication plays a central role in raising awareness, mobilizing action, and shaping public narratives. Whether through speeches, media campaigns, community organizing, or social media hashtags, effective communication can help bring attention to injustices and inspire collective efforts toward a better future.

Framing and Messaging in Social Movements

How an issue is communicated often determines how it is understood and who joins the cause. Framing refers to how a topic is presented, which affects how audiences interpret it. For example, describing undocumented immigration as a “humanitarian issue” frames it differently than calling it a “border crisis.” Language choices, visual imagery, and storytelling all influence how people emotionally connect with a cause.

Activists and advocates carefully construct messages to resonate with specific audiences, counter dominant narratives, and highlight overlooked perspectives. Understanding audience, context, and cultural sensitivity is essential for persuasive and ethical communication.

Real-World Example: Greta Thunberg and the Global Climate Movement

At just 15 years old, Greta Thunberg began striking from school every Friday to protest government inaction on climate change. Sitting alone outside the Swedish parliament with a handmade sign, her quiet protest grew into a global movement—Fridays for Future—mobilizing millions of students across continents.

What makes Greta’s communication so powerful is not just her message, but her strategy:

  • Framing and Moral Clarity: She consistently frames climate inaction as a moral failure, challenging adults in power with direct statements like, “You say you love your children above all else, and yet you are stealing their future.”
  • Ethos and Avowed Identity: Greta speaks openly about being autistic, calling it her “superpower.” Her identity helps her establish credibility as someone who is unwavering, detail-focused, and not swayed by political spin.
  • Global Platform: From viral TED Talks to blunt speeches at the United Nations, she uses concise, emotional language to communicate urgency, using soundbites that are easily shared and remembered.
  • Inclusive and Decentralized Messaging: Fridays for Future is not about one leader. Greta often redirects attention to frontline communities in the Global South and amplifies voices historically excluded from environmental movements.

This example shows:

  • Strategic framing and moral appeals can elevate youth-led social movements.
  • Public speaking that centers personal identity and urgency can reframe global discourse.
  • Inclusive communication helps sustain global solidarity, especially across unequal contexts.

Reflection Prompt:

Greta Thunberg used moral framing, identity, and inclusive storytelling to mobilize a global movement. Think of a time when a speaker—youth, peer, or activist—used communication to create awareness or shift your perspective. What strategies did they use? How did their message make an impact?

Grassroots Communication and Community Voice

Social change doesn’t just come from large organizations or charismatic leaders. Grassroots efforts, those led by everyday people in their own communities, often rely on local knowledge, personal stories, and direct dialogue. These forms of communication may include community meetings, posters in local languages, door-to-door conversations, or neighborhood-based social media campaigns.

Grassroots communication is often more inclusive and responsive because it centers the voices of those most affected by the issue. This approach challenges top-down models and emphasizes participation, equity, and relationship-building as essential to sustainable change.

Media, Technology, and Amplification

Digital tools like Twitter, TikTok, podcasts, and livestreaming platforms allow social movements to bypass traditional gatekeepers and reach global audiences. For example, videos recorded during protests or moments of injustice can be shared instantly, drawing worldwide attention and sparking dialogue. Hashtags like #BlackLivesMatter or #MeToo illustrate how simple phrases can catalyze global conversations and connect people across borders.

However, digital amplification also comes with risks: surveillance, misinformation, and burnout can threaten the safety and sustainability of online activism. Ethical considerations about privacy, representation, and the spread of unverified information are increasingly important for communication in the digital age.

Real-World Example: The Power of Parkland Students’ Advocacy

After the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, student survivors became outspoken advocates for gun reform. Within days, they began speaking at rallies, organizing on social media, and appearing on national television. Using Twitter and other platforms, they challenged politicians, corrected misinformation, and amplified the voices of young people often left out of public policy debates (Levenson, Riess, & Yan, 2018).

What made their communication especially powerful was their ability to combine personal testimony with strategic messaging. They used their lived experience to make the issue feel urgent and real while employing compelling soundbites, visuals, and hashtags like #NeverAgain to frame the conversation. Their efforts led to the March for Our Lives movement, which mobilized millions and sparked new legislation in several states.

This example shows:

  • Strategic communication can elevate youth voices and shift public discourse.
  • Personal storytelling paired with strong framing can drive national conversations.
  • Digital platforms allow grassroots leaders to bypass traditional media gatekeeping.

Reflection Prompt:

How did the Parkland students use communication to challenge political norms and draw public attention to gun violence? What lessons can activists and educators take from their approach to message framing and platform use?

Public Speaking and Persuasion in Social Contexts

Effective public speaking and persuasive communication go hand-in-hand; they’re essential tools for advocating change and mobilizing communities. When used with awareness of social context, these skills can help shift mindsets, build coalitions, and inspire collective action. At the same time, persuasion can backfire if it relies solely on emotion or manipulates rather than engages.

Rhetoric and Persuasion in Social Contexts

Rhetoric is the art of effective or persuasive communication. Rooted in classical traditions, rhetorical study helps us understand how messages influence audiences across different social settings. Aristotle identified three core rhetorical appeals:

  • Ethos (credibility): Establishes the speaker’s trustworthiness or authority.

  • Pathos (emotion): Connects with the audience’s feelings, values, or experiences.

  • Logos (logic): Uses reasoning and evidence to support claims.

Effective speakers draw on all three appeals to build trust, create emotional resonance, and make sound arguments.

From a sociological perspective, rhetorical strategies are especially impactful when aligned with an understanding of audience, cultural identity, and systems of power. Persuasion is never neutral; it occurs within specific social contexts, shaped by who is speaking, who is listening, and the broader structures of privilege, inequality, and meaning.

Speaking to Inform and Persuade

Informative speaking aims to increase the audience’s understanding of a topic. It might involve explaining an issue, breaking down a process, or presenting research in a clear, structured way. Persuasive speaking goes a step further; it tries to influence beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors. While both require clarity and evidence, persuasive speaking also calls for emotional connection, credibility, and ethical reasoning.

In social contexts, persuasion is often about more than winning an argument; it’s about inspiring action or shifting how people see the world. Effective speakers know how to connect with diverse audiences, anticipate resistance, and ground their arguments in values that resonate across lines of difference.

Context Matters

Persuasive strategies don’t exist in a vacuum. A message that resonates in one setting may fall flat in another, depending on the audience’s background, values, and social identities. For example, a climate activist speaking to policymakers might use statistics and economic incentives, while the same speaker addressing a youth rally might focus on personal stories and urgency.

Sociological communication reminds us that every speech takes place in a social context, shaped by power, privilege, identity, and institutional norms. Who gets invited to speak, whose voices are amplified, and how messages are received are all influenced by these dynamics.

Ethical Persuasion

In a world filled with misinformation and manipulation, ethical persuasion is critical. This means using accurate sources, avoiding logical fallacies, and respecting the autonomy of your audience. It also means being transparent about your goals and considering the impact of your message on different groups.

As you develop persuasive speaking skills, consider questions like:

  • Whose interests are being served by this message?
  • How does my position or identity shape my credibility?
  • Am I inviting dialogue, or just demanding agreement?

When persuasive communication is grounded in ethics and inclusivity, it becomes a tool not just for influence but for social responsibility.

Strategies for Building Inclusive and Effective Communication Practices

Whether you’re organizing a campaign, giving a speech, or facilitating a classroom discussion, effective communicators are intentional, inclusive, and responsive to their audience and context. Drawing from rhetorical principles and sociological insight, the strategies below can help you communicate in ways that are not only persuasive but also equitable and accessible.

Know your audience. Tailor your examples, tone, and language to reflect the values, experiences, and cultural backgrounds of those you’re trying to reach. The same message may land differently depending on who’s listening.

Balance ethos, pathos, and logos. Persuasive communication relies on a combination of credibility (ethos), emotional connection (pathos), and logical reasoning (logos). Together, these appeals create messages that feel authentic and grounded.

Use storytelling. Personal narratives can bring abstract issues to life. They humanize experiences, create emotional resonance, and help audiences see themselves in the message.

Engage rhetorically. Repetition, rhetorical questions, vivid imagery, and strategic phrasing can help emphasize your key points and make your message more memorable.

Include a clear call to action. Effective communication doesn’t just inform; it moves people. A strong call to action invites your audience to take a specific next step, from signing a petition to sharing a story or having a difficult conversation.

Know your audience. Tailor your examples, tone, and language to reflect the values, experiences, and cultural backgrounds of those you’re trying to reach. The same message may land differently depending on who’s listening.

Balance ethos, pathos, and logos. Persuasive communication relies on a combination of credibility (ethos), emotional connection (pathos), and logical reasoning (logos). Together, these appeals create messages that feel authentic and grounded.

Use storytelling. Personal narratives can bring abstract issues to life. They humanize experiences, create emotional resonance, and help audiences see themselves in the message.

Engage rhetorically. Repetition, rhetorical questions, vivid imagery, and strategic phrasing can help emphasize your key points and make your message more memorable.

Include a clear call to action. Effective communication doesn’t just inform; it moves people. A strong call to action invites your audience to take a specific next step, from signing a petition to sharing a story or having a difficult conversation.

Practice cultural competence and language sensitivity. Inclusive communication begins with awareness. Words carry different meanings depending on cultural context, lived experience, and social position. Avoid idioms or references that may not be widely understood, and choose language that affirms rather than excludes. If you’re not sure how something will land, ask yourself: Who might be left out or misunderstood by the way I’m framing this message?Inclusive communication

Invite feedback and ongoing learning. No one gets it right all the time. Inclusive communication means staying open to feedback, especially from those whose voices are often marginalized. Invite questions and critiques as part of your process: Was that clear? Did I miss something? How could I say this more effectively or inclusively?

Center accessibility and universal design. Accessibility is not an afterthought—it’s a foundational part of ethical communication. Consider how your message will reach people with different needs and abilities. That might mean using alt-text for images, adding captions to videos, offering printed and digital versions, or avoiding color-dependent visuals.

Listen with intention. Effective communicators know when to speak and when to listen. Deep, intentional listening shows respect, builds understanding, and helps uncover voices or perspectives that might otherwise be overlooked. Listening isn’t passive; it’s an active commitment to equity.

Drawing on rhetorical principles and sociological insight, the strategies below help foster communication that is both persuasive and inclusive. The following table summarizes these strategies and provides concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-world communication settings.

Table 14.1: Strategies for Inclusive and Persuasive Communication
Source: Veronica Van Ry licensed CC BY-NC-SA.
Strategy Purpose Example
Know Your Audience Tailor language and tone to listeners’ values and context. Adjust formality when speaking to a peer group vs. a professional panel.
Balance Ethos, Pathos, Logos Combine credibility, emotion, and logic for persuasive messaging. Share a personal story (pathos), cite a source (ethos), and explain a trend (logos).
Use Storytelling Make abstract ideas concrete and relatable. Begin a presentation with a lived experience related to your topic.
Engage Rhetorically Highlight key points using repetition, metaphor, or vivid phrasing. Repeat a memorable phrase or ask a rhetorical question to spark reflection.
Provide a Call to Action Inspire your audience to act or respond. End with a clear next step, like signing up, reflecting, or sharing.
Practice Cultural Sensitivity Avoid exclusionary language and affirm diverse identities. Replace idioms with clear language; use inclusive pronouns.
Seek Feedback Make communication more collaborative and responsive. Ask, “Was this message clear? Did I miss any important perspective?”
Design for Accessibility Ensure all people can access and engage with the message. Use captions, clear fonts, and avoid color-only cues.
Listen Actively and Equitably Center voices that are often marginalized or overlooked. Pause before responding; affirm and reflect what you heard.
Deep, intentional listening is not just a skill; it’s a form of equity. As you explored in Chapter 13, truly listening means recognizing when to step back, absorb, and reflect without interrupting or redirecting the conversation. Inclusive communicators listen to understand, not to win. They create space for marginalized voices, validate lived experiences, and resist the urge to dominate or deflect. In this way, listening becomes a form of social action—one that challenges power imbalances and builds trust across differences.

Styles and Types of Listening for Inclusive Communication

As you’ve seen throughout this book, listening is central to inclusive and effective communication. But listening isn’t one-size-fits-all. Scholars have identified several listening styles that serve different goals:

Inclusive communicators learn to shift styles depending on the needs of the moment.

Real-World Example: ACT UP and the Fight for AIDS Awareness

In the 1980s and early 1990s, as the AIDS crisis intensified, government agencies and mainstream media were slow to respond. In reaction, activists formed the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP), a grassroots organization committed to ending the AIDS crisis through direct action, public protest, and strategic communication.

ACT UP used bold, creative tactics to grab media attention and shift public discourse. Their slogans—like “Silence = Death”—were simple but powerful, visually striking, and emotionally resonant. Protestors staged die-ins at government buildings, interrupted TV broadcasts, and distributed educational materials in marginalized communities. These efforts reframed AIDS from a “moral” issue to a public health crisis, pressured the FDA to expedite drug approvals, and helped humanize the epidemic by centering the stories of those most affected.

This example shows:

  • Grassroots activism can effectively challenge dominant narratives and demand policy change.

  • Strategic framing and public spectacle can shift awareness and reframe marginalized issues.

  • Storytelling and visibility are essential tools in humanizing health and social justice movements.

Reflection Prompt:

How did ACT UP use communication to confront institutional silence and reshape public understanding of the AIDS crisis? What lessons can we learn from their message framing, slogans, and use of public space in advocacy?

Discussion

As we’ve seen throughout this chapter, communication is not just about exchanging information; it’s a social act shaped by power, identity, and context. Whether you’re giving a presentation, organizing a campaign, or engaging in everyday conversation, your choices as a communicator can either reinforce the status quo or push for greater equity and inclusion. Now it’s your turn to reflect on how the tools you’ve learned can be applied in real life.

Communication as Action

Discussion Prompt:

Think of a time when communication played a role in creating (or resisting) social change—whether in a protest, a classroom, a community meeting, or even a social media post. What strategies made the message effective or ineffective?

Follow-up Question:

How might concepts like audience awareness, rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), or inclusive language have influenced the outcome? What lessons can you apply to your own communication in professional, civic, or academic settings?

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Communication is a powerful tool not just for sharing ideas, but for shaping society. When we understand communication as a social act shaped by identity, power, and context, we begin to see how our words and choices influence the world around us. Whether you’re advocating for change, delivering a speech, or facilitating a dialogue, the strategies in this chapter remind us that ethical, inclusive, and intentional communication can create connection and spark transformation. The most impactful communicators are not always the loudest, but the most thoughtful—those who listen well, speak with purpose, and strive to build understanding across differences.

Key Takeaways

  • Communication can be a catalyst for social change. Activists, educators, and community leaders use framing, storytelling, and strategic messaging to challenge dominant narratives and promote justice. (MLO1)

  • Public speaking and persuasion are shaped by social context. Factors like audience identity, cultural norms, and power dynamics influence how messages are created, delivered, and received. (MLO2)

  • Inclusive communication requires intention and reflection. Using culturally sensitive language, seeking feedback, designing for accessibility, and listening actively can make messages more equitable and effective. (MLO3)

Check Your Understanding

References

Christiansen, A. E. & Hanson, J. J. (2009). Comedy as cure for tragedy: Act up and the rhetoric of aids. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 82(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639609384148

Levenson, E., Riess, R., & Yan, H. (2018, March 25). Hundreds of thousands march for their lives across the U.S. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/24/us/march-for-our-lives/index.html

Licensing and Attribution: This chapter is an adaptation of:

It has been remixed with original content and is licensed CC BY-NC-SA.

definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Sociological Communication (2nd edition) Copyright © by Veronica Van Ry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book