Part 4: Duties and Stakeholder Theory

49 Can stakeholder theory and profit maximization be reconciled?

Stakeholder theory and profit maximization are deeply compatible theories, although they need not be. We will consider both views.

Stakeholder theory and Milton Friedman’s views may be reconciled, as we have attempted to establish in this text. Long-term profit maximization flows straightforwardly from stakeholder theory, which says that businesses should consider the interests of many parties in their decision making. At the margins, this should be uncontroversial. For instance, a company that ignores the needs and wants of its employees may find itself without any. Or, a company that ignores its consumers may quickly find they have found other companies willing to satisfy those needs.

Yet, at the same time, proponents of stakeholder theory may balk at attempts to unify these contrasting approaches to business governance. From this perspective, society should hold companies to a higher ethical standard than mere profit maximization.[1] For example, offering companies the privilege of limited liability and legal personhood means that, like early corporations, society may be able to hold them to a higher standard than just acting as profit-making machines.

Exercises

  1. There are many examples of companies ignoring the wishes of key stakeholders and then suffering economic consequences. Find an example, and discuss in light of Milton Friedman and what we have studied of stakeholder theory so far.

  1. Remember, even Milton Friedman acknowledged the need to abide by ethical principles en route to profit maximization!

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Business Ethics: 100 Questions Copyright © by Jeff Lingwall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.