Part 4: Duties and Stakeholder Theory

58 What are the “take home” messages from this Part?

This Part offered a way to systematically think about those affected by business decisions, through stakeholder theory.

As we conclude this Part, several points are worth emphasizing.

  1. Stakeholder theory offers both a contrast, and complement, to traditional conceptions of fiduciary duties in business settings.
  2. Categorizing and prioritizing stakeholders may help aid business decision making
  3. The stakeholder retaliation threshold, or SRT, provides a way to consider the tipping point before which stakeholders react to CSR / ESG issues.
  4. The level of the SRT varies by industry, and by firm.
  5. We can characterize CSR / ESG issues according to the Zadek Civil Learning Model, which suggests ways in which companies respond to a variety of issues.
  6. Finally, we can integrate stakeholder and ethical analysis by letting stakeholder theory inform those affected in ethical decision making.

Exercises

  1. Do a Google News search for “stakeholder” and examine the results. What current opinions and perspectives do you find? Do you agree or disagree with these perspectives?

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Business Ethics: 100 Questions Copyright © by Jeff Lingwall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.