12.2 Homo economicus

Are we always so rational when foraging? Do we only gather the calories we need to feed ourselves and those for whom we are responsible? Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT) explains many things about our evolutionary past. The costs (e.g., calories and time spent foraging, risk of predation, or potential injury) must outweigh the benefits (e.g., reproductive success) for OFT to be successful.

This perspective has been deemed Homo economicus in philosophy because it assumes that humans will always make the rational choice when obtaining food, mates, and other resources. As H. economicus, we must be narrowly self-interested, consistently rational, and focused on our own success above and beyond all else. But are we?

 

illustration of human mind fading into a computer chipset.
Humans are often portrayed as rational thinkers, making decisions primarily based upon logic – like a computer.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Introduction to Evolution & Human Behavior Copyright © 2022 by Shelly Volsche, PhD is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book